Asset and scanning coverage
Check which systems the current scans cover and identify gaps that affect the value of the results.
Utilities Studio / Cybersecurity
Give your engineers a backlog they can prioritize and work through.
Validate vulnerability findings, prioritize exposed assets, and organize remediation. Build a vulnerability management workflow around your existing tools.
You have scan results, but the backlog keeps growing and engineers are still debating what matters. We review findings against the affected systems and business impact, then help establish owners and verification steps. That gives security and engineering a shared record of what needs fixing and what remains open.
The assessment
Vulnerability management is the ongoing work of identifying, prioritizing, addressing, and verifying security weaknesses. We review your asset coverage and existing findings, then help your team decide what needs attention first. The output is a remediation register and a working process for ownership, exceptions, and verification.
Check which systems the current scans cover and identify gaps that affect the value of the results.
Review reported weaknesses alongside exposure, affected services, and business impact.
Assign findings to teams, record dependencies, and make risk acceptance or deferred work explicit.
Agree how fixes are checked and how unresolved risk is reported over time.
Working with your team
Tell us what is driving the work and which systems matter. We agree access, exclusions, and operational limits, including who to contact if the assessment uncovers an urgent issue.
Assess the systems in scope and document the evidence. Findings explain the affected assets and business impact, with the limits of the investigation made clear.
Review the findings with the people responsible for fixing them. Work through priorities and questions about remediation. The proposal sets out any follow-up verification.
Asset coverage, scanning frequency, validation needs, reporting requirements and remediation coordination.
The first cycle establishes coverage and a baseline. Ongoing review and verification cadence are agreed around asset changes, risk and your release process.
The practitioner behind the work
Sheeraz Ali is our Head of Cybersecurity. His work spans application, cloud, network, and AI assessments. His personal track record includes leading pentests at Cobalt and building the internal pentest programme at SolarWinds.
Read Sheeraz's security backgroundSheeraz's personal track record
His website lists OSCP, CRTP, CRTE, CREST CRT and CPSA, CBBH, and CKA.
At SolarWinds, he delivered 120+ internal pentests. As CTO at Pwned Labs, he built a platform serving 40,000+ practitioners. He co-developed Mobexler, selected for Black Hat Arsenal, and presented research at Nullcon and c0c0n.
Explore his career timelineFAQ
We start with the tools and findings you already have. Any additional tooling is proposed only after reviewing coverage gaps.
Severity is a starting point. Our team also considers exposure, affected business systems, exploit evidence and available mitigations. A critical issue on an exposed service may need a different response from an isolated finding with limited impact.
No. Ongoing vulnerability management maintains visibility and tracks remediation. Penetration testing explores attack paths and validates impact within a defined scope. The two can inform each other.
Manual penetration testing for your applications, cloud, and networks. Get validated findings with reproduction steps, business impact, and guidance for your engineers.
Review AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud security. Assess IAM permissions, exposed services, and workload boundaries, with a prioritized hardening plan.
Tell us what your team needs to resolve, which systems are involved, and any deadline. We will work through the scope and reporting needs with you.